Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunrise Coigney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. One opinion not considered due sockpuppetry j⚛e deckertalk 15:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Sunrise Coigney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

only acted for 4 years, only has 4 credits, mainly notable for being Mark Ruffalo's wife and notability isn't WP:INHERITED LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep as subject has drawn sufficient coverage in reliable sources to cross the verifiability and notability thresholds. Notability is not a competition. - Dravecky (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment sufficient coverage? The 3 references on her article are all about her husband with just mentions of her. Which by our general notability guidelines, the subject needs "Significant coverage addressing the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a passing mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.


 * Also, for Notability (people), it stays for entertainers and actors that
 * Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. - She doesn't.
 * Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. - She doesn't.:
 * Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. - She doesn't. - LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Reply Why some invest so much passion and energy in seeking deletion of the marginally notable instead of creating new content or improving existing articles has always been a puzzlement to me. - Dravecky (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I improve articles IF they can be improved, (ex: Hayley Hasselhoff, Maude Apatow, Diem Brown) but if someone is only notable because of their spouse and shouldn't have their own article, then I nominate them. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 07:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect to her husband. Insufficient independent notability (ie. lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources). But her brief cinema and tv career can be noted in her husband's article. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr  \ talk / 06:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect - agree with Candleabracadabra. -- bydand • talk  08:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.