Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunrise English Medium School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Just an aside, just because an individual editor can not access a source used in an article doesn't mean that it is not a reliable, independent, worthwhile source. If other, experienced editors can access a source and they attest that it benefits an article and you can't access it, exercise good faith and take their word for it. Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Sunrise English Medium School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No significant coverage beyond passing mentions and a few articles about routine events at the school. Tube·of·Light 05:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, India,  and West Bengal. Tube·of·Light 05:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Borderline case, there might be enough coverage such as 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. to allow on notability. There are more but I stopped looking. - Indefensible (talk) 06:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies WP:GNG per Indefensible's sources plus several articles from 10-15 years ago in The Statesman and other short but non-trivial mentions, eg, etc. &mdash;siro&chi;o 07:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. - Indefensible (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * •DELETE- Only reference listed on the article is a non-RS. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 14:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Did you read the sources that Indefensible and Siroxo provided before !voting? JML1148 ( talk &#124; contribs ) 06:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I specificaly said "listed on the article". PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 13:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * and 3 out out of the 4 links he provided say access denied. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per sources provided by Indefensible and Siroxo. Combined, there's definitely enough to pass WP:GNG. JML1148 ( talk &#124; contribs ) 06:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 3 out of those sources provided say access denied PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @PaulGamerBoy360: The two Proquest articles are accessible through the Wikipedia Library, and having a paywall alone does not disqualify a source, per WP:PAYWALL (though I wouldn't count the TOI article towards notability). ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 00:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Now the pages are loading, when i previously clicked the proquest ariticle links provided, an "Access Denied" message popped up. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 00:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.