Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset (Warriors)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. No consensus for a redirect. (Non admin closure). Qst 16:03, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Sunset (Warriors)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

If you take out the plot summary (which is about 4-5 paragraphs) and the "other" information which is also just part of the plot, you have one sentence and an infobox. Nothing in here demonstrates how this meets the notability guidelines of WP:BK through reliable, secondary sources. Metros 02:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep book from notable series; this info. belongs in WP, and organizing itby book is sensible. JJL 02:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - needs sources to establish notability, but that shouldn't be hard in the slightest. Artw 06:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as article has no verifiable sources and no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability. I agree with Metros that the heavy in universe perspective of this article means that it provides no real world information. --Gavin Collins 13:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and redirect to the series article. The current article has no encyclopedic value, but as a redirect it serves a purpose in aiding searches. -Harmil 22:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - A bit of time is needed to do the research to establish the notability of the individual book, but with a series that already meets WP:BK it won't take too much to establish things. I'm even looking for the right articles now. Kitsufox ( Fox's Den ) 00:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.