Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  16:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Sunset (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Potentially non-notable game I dream of horses (T) @ 12:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @  12:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @  12:20, 21 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Looks notable to me: innovative game from highly-regarded dev house with coverage across a wide range of media. Colapeninsula (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – Notable per sources. Has received significant coverage in Forbes, Digital Spy and CNET. North America1000 15:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yeah, the sources listed above look good to me.  Forbes.com is a tricky one, though, and the blog posts are frequently written by non-journalists.  You need to be careful when you cite it and make sure that the author has journalistic credentials.  There seems to be enough coverage already to satisfy the GNG.  Plus, it's already starting to get professional review, such as The Washington Post: . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources - Not entirely sure on Forbes but DigitalSpy & CNET establish notability. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment – The Forbes article is authored by a Forbes contributor, with the disclaimer on the page, "Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own". Forbes is up there in terms of being reliable, and when selecting the "full bio" link about the author on the page, the credentials are impressive. North America1000 17:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as clearly meeting WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.