Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset Nation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Sunset Nation

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * Delete. Non-notable band, fails all criteria at WP:BAND. WWGB (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, a band with a demo, a "TBA" album, and a trumped up "controversy". Not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only significant coverage I could find was this, which also forms the basis for this Blabbermouth.net story.--Michig (talk) 12:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Object. Additional coverage found at here, here, here, and here. Band has released full length albums. No demos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimcrik7 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fullmetalrock has just a link to the band's MySpace, the others are fansites. If you can find anything significant in newspapers, print magazines, or professional websites, this would help to establish notability.--Michig (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * More coverage found in this static multimedia article here. And here in the LA times. Another in the OC Register. More on Euro News —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimcrik7 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Not sure whether Static Multimedia would be considered a reliable source, and again it just discusses the same one (non-)event. Others are just listings. Any live/record reviews, etc.? We need examples where people have written significantly about the band.--Michig (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Here is a record review. News coverage should be more than significant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimcrik7 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

— Jimcrik7 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

*Oppose. Subject has seen coverage by the mainstream media, making it a notable article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikepacecho (talk • contribs) — Mikepacecho (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

*Oppose. I think the coverage presented seems reasonable. MikeyJames15 (talk) 12:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC) — MikeyJames15 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. *Keep this article. Subject has generated coverage from a reliable sources (News) as per the criteria at WP:BAND. TeamWorm (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC) — TeamWorm (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. Doesn't seem to pass WP:MUSIC. X X X antiuser eh? 13:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

*Keep. Satisfies the criteria at WP:MUSIC and has reliable sources. KingHammer (talk) 13:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC) — KingHammer (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

*Allow. Seems to passWP:MUSIC. UtopiaGod (talk) 02:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC) — UtopiaGod (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: User:Mikepacecho, User:MikeyJames15, User:TeamWorm, User:KingHammer and User:UtopiaGod have all been blocked as sockpuppets of User:Jimcrik7.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.