Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine Bakeries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Sunshine Bakeries

 * – ( View AfD View log )

May not pass WP:GNG, and indicative that the article is written with a promotional slant. Article was draftified before for incubation but was moved back by author without improvements made. Assessment of sources below. – robertsky (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. – robertsky (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – robertsky (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. – robertsky (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Draft, I say draft the article again and strictly inform the editor not to undraft it unless more sources can be found. But it may be hard considering not many people tend to report on bakeries. 115.78.92.34 (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Source analysis is excellent. Non-notable.   scope_creep Talk  18:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Exists, yes, but not notable enough, and barring some major event is unlikely to become notable in the near future. Great analysis by . ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 06:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or draftify. An argument could be made that the review from Today counts—it's the second largest newspaper in Singapore, has an identified author, and is just barely long enough to be plausibly SIGCOV—but it's not enough. Looking for other sources, there's this, which seemed promising from the title: However, it only actually mentions Sunshine once and is instead about the parent company, Auric Pacific Group (not sure if that's notable). Google Books search turns up only what appears to be phonebook directory listings. With that WP:BEFORE exhausted, I don't see much hope for this. I'm open to draftifying, though, as the oldest bakery chain in Singapore (founded in 1930) seems like a topic of enough significance that it could someday be notable. &#123;{u&#124;  Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 18:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is a Chinese article by Singapore's Chinese newspaper, Lianhe Zaobao, on brands which have their products Made in Singapore. While the article is brief, it includes a video produced by the newspaper The series is located here about 10 brands, inclusive of Sunshine Bakeries. This will probably qualify as another source for GNG. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:18, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: The last 2 sources in the table seem reliable. And so are the ones idicated above. I also found a few more reliable sources which talk about the company (and some of its activities):, and . Though the article needs some clean-up by removing anything promotional, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 13:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I have semi-protected this AfD for a week because of persistent disruption by an LTA – I also note that I have blocked 115.78.92.34, who !voted above, as a proxy; probably the same person responsible for the other disruption. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.