Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine Coast Health Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete spam. El_C 07:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Sunshine Coast Health Centre and User:Sunshinecoast001
This appears to be an advertisement for a non-notable place. These two pages are User:Sunshinecoast001's only edits. --NE2 12:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both as spam. MER-C 12:51, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both - article is spam, user is a spammer. --Dennis The TIger 16:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Both. Article does not meet requirements of WP:CORP or WP:V.  User page violates WP:USER. -- Satori Son 17:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Spam spam spam, spam spam spam, spam spam spam (spam spam spam), spam delete (both of them). Tracker/TTV (myTalk|myWork|myInbox) 19:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both. per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 21:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment It strikes me that this is not the place to discuss the article itself, as it should be (and was, by this nominator) the subject of an AfD. Somewhat confusing to have an article listed both here and at AfD. Agent 86 16:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Actually, while the AfD template on the article page and the MfD template on the user page both link here, the individual listings are transcluded on the proper pages: Articles for deletion/Log/2006 September 10 for the article and Miscellany for deletion for the user page.  A little odd to combine the two discussions, but I think it works okay in this case. -- Satori Son 18:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete user page as spam. Delete article as an advert, unless some notability can be found and added to the article.  --  Dcflyer 19:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.