Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshock the Echidna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete per G4 by Gwernol. --Coredesat talk 02:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Sunshock the Echidna
hoax - zero google hits, discussion supports that it is a hoax, many claims that it is a hoax, none claiming that is it valid Brian 15:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)btball

It's definitely a hoax. I'm not one for spreading false information, I can verify it is 100% - You can tell right away by looking at the pictures of this "Sunshock the Echidna", they're badly edited. Plus the background of him is that typical of an unoriginal fan character. Lucky Winters 15:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, an ultra-strong one at that. WP:HOAX. ~ Matticus78 15:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per mod. Should also delete Sunshock the Echidna (character), which is a copy of Sunshock the Echidna. -- VederJuda 16:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing but a poor fancharacter edit with some n00b trying to pass off his lame character as an official one to buy some brownie points, yet fails drastically at it. And fails at life, too. Nalerenn 17:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this and Sunshock the Echidna (character) - they are both fairly obvious hoaxes with no googles. RN 16:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD-G1 or A7, fails WP:HOAX, WP:NFT, and WP:FICT. Sunshock the Echidna (character) was speedy deleted the same way, and this is a copy of that article. This article is also a bigtime vandal magnet, since the character doesn't exist. --Coredesat talk 21:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as total nonsense.--Nydas 21:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. --Arnzy (whats up?)  21:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. SM247 My Talk  23:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.