Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunteck Realty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion, with users stating that the article qualifies for deletion as per not meeting notability guidelines and as per WP:NOTPROMO. North America1000 04:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Sunteck Realty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am not convinced that any of the awards are significant. I note a few of them are for "young achievers", a convenient synonym for "not yet notable"  DGG ( talk ) 05:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I tend to concur about the awards, although I am not an expert in the area. As for general coverage, I found a couple of mentions in mainstream sources and several mentions in the financial press (chiefly about stock prices, etc.). I don't think that this is enough to pass WP:CORPDEPTH, but if anyone finds any solid sources I might be willing to change my mind. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 06:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- the article copy consists exclusively of "Awards" (possibly pay-per-play), thus offering no encyclopedic value to the reader. WP:PROMO applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No value. scope_creep (talk) 02:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as what's offered as sourcing is simply PR itself and that's not surprising given the article circumstances here. SwisterTwister   talk  00:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.