Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunteck Realty (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 20:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Sunteck Realty
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet current NCORP requirements--references are either PR or notices, and the firm is not large enough for any presumption of importance.  DGG ( talk ) 09:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I was going to send to Afd when it was listed at coin, but now looking at it a second time, I think it is more or less a duplicate of the Bloomberg listing, and has little encyclopædic value. Fails WP:CORP. scope_creep (talk) 11:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Busy, busy, busy. -The Gnome (talk) 13:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GOLDENRULE. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:31, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, and fails to establish why it has a claim to encyclopedia notability; just another run of the mill company bereft of significance, at the moment at least.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep The article is about a publicly listed real estate company, founded by an Indian billionaire (as per Forbes list 2009 and 2010) which clearly meets WP:NCORP, WP:LISTED. It has received significant media coverage in mainstream media houses in India and also covered by The New York Times, Forbes and Fortune (magazine) that makes the article meets WP:GNG, WP:BASIC. And undoubtedly meets WP:NCORP. Performing Google News and HighBeam has huge media coverage.--Eramritasharma (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * — Eramritasharma (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Disagree. The majority of delete votes mention NCORP, not GNG, as the company has accrued some coverage. The main issues is that NCORP and CORPDEPTH need to be met with in-depth, independent coverage, which the article lacks. Stories noting that "Sunteck buys X stake in company Y", "Q4 profits rise for Sunteck by X percentage" or "Market A bodes well for company (Sunteck) B" are not in-depth coverage, even if they come from reliable sources. In addition, it is hard to see how a company with a revenue of $140 million is notable enough for an encyclopedia.--SamHolt6 (talk) 19:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP, no evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:17, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: WP:CANVASSING by User:Eramritasharma: --Guy Macon (talk) 17:17, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Single-purpose account, editing pattern and canvassing suggest that Eramritasharma has a COI and probably an undeclared paid editor Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks evidence of notability. Maproom (talk) 06:47, 20 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.