Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperConsciousness Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

SuperConsciousness Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PERIODICAL. jps (talk) 12:03, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Subject is utterly non-notable. Article is little more than a piece of PROFRINGE SPAM. Sources fail RS. A Google yielded nothing but promotional hits. -Ad Orientem (talk) 12:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - this could be a CSD:A7 candidate since the article gives absolutely zero indication of the notability of this subject. --Salimfadhley (talk) 12:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing of note here. : Magazines are not eligible under A7 (unfortunately...). --Randykitty (talk) 15:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable fringy spam, should been cleaned up years ago. WegianWarrior (talk) 18:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete As nonsense. --Seduisant (talk) 18:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Flatly fails WP:GNG.- MrX 19:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone above me - Not one ounce of notability. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Suggest Speedy Close per WP:SNOWBALL. Normally I am not a fan of short-cutting due process in AfD, but this would seem to be a case where the verdict is in and it's not going to change. I think there is a clear, probably unanimous, consensus that in a sane world this article should have been a speedy delete. No need to drag things out just to see how many more Delete !votes we can rack up. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Obviously fails to meet WP:GNG. QuackGuru  ( talk ) 16:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Unsourced and unsourceable fringe spam. Nothing worth saving or merging. Can be deleted in its entirety. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 00:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.