Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperHeroHype.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus, defaulting to keep. --Polaron | Talk 18:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

SuperHeroHype.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Questionable notability, lack of secondary sources, and the page seems to be a target for disgruntled members of the forum to air out personal vendettas. Also, when it was proposed for deletion, the page creator said he/she would add information proving notability, but that was months ago and it was never done.  * one more night * talk/contribs  06:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

MrWotUp (talk) 11:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable, independant sources, so I don't see how this subject is notable... --Jayron32| talk | contribs 06:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral, leaning towards keep My initial reaction was "delete", but the site isn't exactly small - there's site member reviews going back 4+ years. Lots of articles about this and that, albeit lots of Google ads. I can see deleting for lack of secondary sources, but I think the site has notability simply because there's a lot of information on it and a lot of folks seem to use it. While third-party sources seem to be limited to the gaming/fantasy movie world, there are quite a few other sites that reference superherohype.com.Tanthalas39 (talk) 06:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * keep - this is fairly prominent website, with exclusive news and interviews for Comic Book and Fantasy related movies.  The page is often source by sites as newsarama, darkhorizons and comicbookresources. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete as insufficiently notable. Website has not been the subject of non-trivial coverage by reliable, third-party published sources. — Satori Son 01:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep highly notable site, one of the most famous alongside Ain't It Cool News and IGN. Alientraveller (talk) 16:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep informative about website and its members from an objective angle, regarding the Boards and the former member Cristo


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.  -- Hiding T 16:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral, leaning towards keep per Tanthalas39. I think deletion policy says it best.  If in doubt, don't delete.  There's enough doubt here that makes me believe we shouldn't delete. Hiding T 16:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.