Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperLame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

SuperLame

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable upcoming film, wholly unsourced, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball as one of the contents of What Wikipedia is not. It is not shooting/filming for the film yet according to the article. Mediran talk 00:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero notability. And by "zero" I mean "zero links, zero IMDb, zero period". Sidatio (talk) 01:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The name says it all. - MrX 02:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of notability, no references, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball for unreleased films.-- xanchester  (t)  02:53, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow delete - Far too soon, I haven't found any relevant sources with Google US and UK and this isn't surprising, considering there are few details about the film itself. SwisterTwister   talk  03:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is just nothing about it anywhere. like zero. No IMDb, No website.Nothing ZacJohn435  talk  23:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. A film that is not the subject of reliable coverage (yet) and which has not even started filming yet can't possibly be notable. SuperLame indeed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.