Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Awesome Party/Conservatives only


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. WP:SNOW closure. Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:06, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Super Awesome Party/Conservatives only

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Organization that clearly fails the notability guidelines, WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Nominating to AfD to have a deletion discussion so that this can be salted if created again. Monty 845  04:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm shocked and awed... 20 members... on facebook... and... no coverage at all? I'm not cynical enough to cry "salt it", generally at least one recreation is needed first, but that aside, this article is a promotional piece for an organization that clearly fails notability guidelines.   S ven M anguard   Wha?  07:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources found in a good faith search. - Pointillist (talk) 09:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, db-group, just like last time. Hairhorn (talk) 11:30, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Didn't know there was a last time. In that case, we should let this run out so that it can be salted, or at the very least, allow db-recreated to come into play.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:27, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Or not. On a quick second thought another speedy and an IAR salt wouldn't bother me at all.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I was really thinking of a salt after the next recreation, not this one, but either way, I think this deletion discussion would be enough for a G4 or salt, even if gets speedy deleted here. (though I'm not sure if the current version is the best case for a speedy) Monty  845  18:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete with an inclination towards the speedy. As impressive as a group that has "skyrocketed in membership from 12 to over 20" must surely be, fails to meet any of the criteria for notability. - Dravecky (talk) 01:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability My76Strat (talk) 02:16, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Do not delete I found this to be an enlightening in depth article on an innovative political system. I heard from many news sources that they will publish more information about it soon. 3:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC) — Oysterizer Insomniac (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete 20 members = non-notable. GabrielF (talk) 03:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.