Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Dollfie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (NAC). RMHED  18:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Super Dollfie

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Why does a different size Dollfie get it's own article? That's not how notability works. Habanero-tan (talk) 19:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 01:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'll look into this one later. I will note, though, that if there is coverage of this product on its own merits, and not as a subset/variant of the regular product, then this specific version might be notable. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 18:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep First of all, I am fairly certain that Super Dollfie is the more notable product line than the smaller Dollfie. Though I'm not an expert on the subject, I pretty certain that the Super Dollfie is more popular, or at least has gotten more covereage in reliable sources.  Anyway, there is no reason why both can't be notable.  This is like asking why does the Hummer H2 or Diet Coke get separate articles from Hummer or Coca-Cola.  There are already a couple sources in the article that look to be reliable, but it looked like there were a lot more reliable sources when I clicked the google news link above. Calathan (talk) 03:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: for above reasons. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Super Dollfies are more notable than 'regular' Dollfies; for the record, ja-wiki actually has a Super Dollfie article but no Dollfie article. If there's not enough to support two articles, I see two potential merges: either merging Super Dollfie and Dollfie or merging Dollfie into a section in Volks, with Super Dollfie as a standalone article. The latter seems better to me.--Chris Johnson (talk) 09:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.