Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Donuts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Super Donuts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence of notability, The references are promotional. (and the article is apparently written by undeclared paid editng group)  DGG ( talk ) 03:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 03:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 03:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 03:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The references appear to be from reliable sources, including daily newspapers. While Wikipedia articles should be free of promotionalism, an article in a reliable source with a promotional tone is still reliable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. If a couple local news articles noting a store opening count as satisfying GNG, then be right back, I have about a billion articles to go write. This coverage is not independent in many cases (multiple interviews with the founder and other articles that are rather clearly just press release/promo pieces). In others, it is not significant, representing just routine coverage of a business opening. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is a stub more written like a promotional blurb than anything else.TH1980 (talk) 05:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  15:28, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources currently in the article don't pass WP:CORPDEPTH; a search for more sources is hindered by the fact that there appear to be many companies/brands around the world called Super Donuts; weighing the number of Google News hits on the first couple of pages, it's not clear that this is the most notable (or least un-notable?) amongst them. There's no unpromotional content at the article worth saving; delete. Girth Summit  (blether) 17:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:25, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as noted above the sources fail NCORP on depth and independence grounds. And no, that was not an intended coffee shop pun. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 14:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article supported by routine announcement coverage, two Q&As, and a 5 paragraph description of the shop's wares bylined to one TNS. None of these provide the in-depth coverage required for WP:NCORP and searches are finding nothing better. AllyD (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.