Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super League XXV regular season table


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Super League XXV regular season table

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Apparently, I "completely messed the whole thing up by redirecting it" to the article where it is completely included in. Hmm. No reason for this separate article about the table, when it is included in the main target page.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

So, why have you requested for it to be deleted?.. L1amw90 (talk) 04:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't get why you've requested for this to be deleted. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it. Plus, why add a redirect on it? There was nothing wrong with it in the first place. Once you added the redirect, I couldn't even open the page to view it.. there's just simply no need for this to be even deleted. I didn't create the page, it was created earlier tonight in order to show the updated WPCT with Salford's deductions.
 * Keep and SNOW close: Absolutely no reason for deletion. If you think you messed up with it technically (why would you even redirect it anyway?), send a message to WP:VPT and they'll be able to see what the problem is.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 07:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a template now. WDM10 (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a template that appears to have been mistakenly moved a few hours ago to article space, but it is now back in template space where it belongs.  C Thomas3   (talk) 07:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep the confusion is partly my fault. The table needed a custom configuration to deal with some circumstances that Module:Sports table can't cope with. Initially I put the table directly into Super League XXV and removed the link to the template page. I was going to delete the template until I realised that it is transcended into several other articles, so I moved the wikitext to this template page. Therefore there may have been a short period when it appeared twice on the Super League page, once as text & once as a transfusion. Bottom line, the template is used in several articles so should stay. Nthep (talk) 10:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.