Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Nova Card Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Super Nova Card Game

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks the required notability. One review in "Arcane". The other source is an exhaustive catalog of all collectible card games ("the first book to catalog every collectible card game ever released"), which is good for verification but not for notability. This game has received extremely little attention after its release, and I couldn't find any other books or good sources about it. No obvious redirect target (e.g. no article for the company), so "delete" it is. Fram (talk) 08:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Although obscure today, the game's development and upcoming release were published in Dragon. That plus the Arcane review would suggest notability. Guinness323 (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The Dragon bit is all of two sentences though, they're "working on a new collectibe card game" which "will be released this summer". Have they actually reviewed the game once it was released? Fram (talk) 19:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 12:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don’t see how it meets the WP:GNG. Sergecross73   msg me  01:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. KartikeyaS  (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete A single review and two passing mentions does not constitute significant coverage. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 08:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.