Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Star Wars

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:24, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Super Star Wars series
The articles Super Star Wars, Super Empire Strikes Back and Super Return of the Jedi appear to refer to non-existent future episodes of the Star Wars franchise, or possibly to video games. Someone seems to have speedied the second one. Dbiv 16:14, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy. They are nonsense summaries of the movies with the word "super" tacked on title. Rmhermen 16:33, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy these, for the love of God in Heaven and all that is pure and good. Ground Zero 17:36, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, now that I know they are about video games, I guess I am compelled to withdraw my vote on the basis that I think that thre is room on Wikipedia for most information that is of interest to some group. It is galling that I have to do so about something that is so trivial and meaningless, especially when it is being pushed by Starblind, who has often votes for deletion of information about unsuccessful political candidates and municipal councillors who are of interest to me and others, but not to him. Vote to keep this trivial and unimportant crap. Ground Zero 21:14, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep and obviously cleanup. All three are VERY well-known (and crazy-hard) games for the Super NES. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  19:57, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: I'm currently working on cleanup duties for these articles. I fixed Super Star Wars (suggest Keep), re-created Super Empire Strikes Back (suggest Keep), and as for Super Return of the Jedi I recommend a redirect to Super Star Wars: Return of the Jedi which I just created. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  21:09, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable video games, however a couple of the articles need to be properly formatted for redirects. 23skidoo 21:08, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, Keep, and Keep. Notable. &mdash; Xezbeth 21:17, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep them all please Yuckfoo 01:16, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all, notable. Megan1967 07:22, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Super Keep all. N-Mantalk 10:55, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, Google clearly establishes existence. Notable video games belong on Wikipedia.-LtNOWIS 03:27, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep on the first two. Redirect on the third. This series is both notable and memorable. Nestea 00:44, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This series is certainly notable, and its existence is verifiable.  A Man In Black 10:21, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.