Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Underwear Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Super Underwear Man

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable comic book character. Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 17:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages per TheLongTone: PAGE''' ]] ) 18:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * --Ahecht ( [[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

PAGE''' ]] ) 18:40, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Super Underwear Man is noted here in the ComicBookDB: http://comicbookdb.com/search.php?form_search=super%20underwear%20man&form_searchtype=FullSite
 * And, Super Underwear Man is noted here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Super_Underwear_Man_The_Californian_16-Jul-1997.png
 * And other references here: http://makeitsomarketing.tripod.com/popularcultureblog/index.blog?start=1369085667&topic_id=1085515
 * Why does the anti-small press bot want to suppress the Super Underwear Man? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeaDubbU (talk • contribs) 18:05, 12 May 2014
 * SeaDubbU, none of those are reliable sources that establish notability. We don't descriminate against small presses, but the subjects of articles must be notable before they can be the subject of a Wikipedia article. --Ahecht ( [[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK


 * Delete, can find no evidence of notability. See alsoArticles for deletion/TPG - Toilet Paper Gun.TheLongTone (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I would also propose adding
 * If the character is not notable, this is a list of non-notable comics.TheLongTone (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If the character is not notable, this is a list of non-notable comics.TheLongTone (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * delete GNG. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article's sources are (at best) questionable. G S Palmer (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. And this is pretty obviously non-notable, too.  When you have to depend on the commons and tripod.com, it's probably time to just give up.  About 50 Google hits total, which leads me to believe there's not going to be any coverage in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete Non-notable, there is no way this article is going to get kept. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both - Source searches are not providing any coverage in reliable source. NorthAmerica1000 18:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.