Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superbrowsergame Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Superbrowsergame Award

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Webgame award. No reliable sources attesting to notability. Peephole (talk) 23:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete nn  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! ) 23:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Article appears on German Wikipedia. I would not say the article meets WP:Note "Significant coverage", but, I must question, are we following WP:Note policy? Tagging the article with, and alerting the article creator? Sephiroth storm (talk) 23:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * "Appears on German Wikipedia" is not cause to keep an article. Notability is not policy, and there is no requirement to tag with Notability or alert the creator. If a thorough search for references was performed and did not turn up anything, it is perfectly acceptable to move straight to AFD.  Pagra shtak  15:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It is, but the phrase "No reliable sources attesting to notability.", to me, means that no such references are in the article. It doesn't give any indication the nominator did the sort of thourough search you mentioned.- Mgm|(talk) 10:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - I am aware that WP:N is not policy, but a guideline, however, it is the topic before us today, as the requestor has claimed that there are no sources atesting to notability. In any case, allow me to quote from WP:N "Although articles should demonstrate the notability of their topics, and articles on topics that do not meet this criterion are generally deleted, it is important to not just consider whether notability is established by the article, but whether it readily could be." I am not arguing that the article cant be deleted without these steps, just that I think it would be approprite to do so in this case. Sephiroth storm (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, you called it policy in your comment, and implied that tagging Notability was required by policy. I just wanted to make it clear that neither is the case.  Pagra shtak  19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I appoligise, I am still relativly new to AfD discussions. Sephiroth storm (talk) 00:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable stub. Tcrow777Talk 10:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.