Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercritical hydrolysis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. WP:SK1. Nominator does not advance a reason for deletion - proposes merger. Merging should be discussed on the article talk page. The Bushranger One ping only 02:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Supercritical hydrolysis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Suggest merge with supercritical fluid Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Might be best to suggest that on the article's talk page first, if you can explain why in more detail. If no one objects, you could always go ahead and merge it. InShaneee (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I did it on the Users talk page that created it, took the direct approach. I used Curation Tools and it automatically creates the review page.--Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 03:42, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 02:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your thoughts. I like the suggestion of including a description of the process in supercritical fluid. Argument for supercritical hydrolysis (SCH) as its own page: as acid hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis are their own pages and are processes, SCH refers to the process by which sugar is created, not just the supercritical water. Dsokubo (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.