Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercross (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 23:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Supercross (film)
Blatant advertising, sounds like a press release, extensive POV issues, questionable notability Rhrad (talk) 18:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Motion picture from major studio. Problems mentioned by nom can be fixed by editing.  D C E dwards 1966  18:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep The film meets criteria set out in WP:Notability (films). Aside from any perceived POV issues or other things of that nature that can be repaired, there are no valid grounds for deletion of this article as per Deletion policy. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Film released by a major film studio starring notable actors (Sophia Bush. Robert Carradine and Robert Patrick among others). Yes, this does need cleanup like removing the "Very Detailed Plot Overview" but theres no real reason to delte it and AfD is not cleanup. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 19:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve per Doc Strange --Numyht (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NF. Content issues can be fixed, but this is a major film from a major studio with notable cast members. 23skidoo (talk) 19:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 20:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. The film has received plenty of reviews, so notability is not an issue. Any other problems are a matter of cleanup. PC78 (talk) 21:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Swik78; notability is clear, and AFD is not clean-up. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. No need to toss out notable article when the nom's concerns can be easily addressed in edit. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 21:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.