Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercult


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 10:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Supercult

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NWEB and WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  10:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:48, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. I found one Baltimore Sun article with sigcov and a few passing mentions on gbooks, but not enough to pass GNG. (The Wired article isn't in-depth coverage of Supercult ; I couldn't find the Associated Content one.) Cheers, gnu 57  18:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – Defunct and not notable. My search for sources yielded exactly the same results as gnu57. --- Coffee  and crumbs  21:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete There's only one piece of significant coverage; no multiple items split across multiple reliable sources to meet our notability requirements. Madness Darkness 23:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.