Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superdickery (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Superdickery
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Very, very little coverage. The only two sources are just slapdash articles that list a bunch of websites that the staff thought were cool; everything else I found was a false positive except for a similarly trivial coverage on Boing Boing. Utterly fails WP:WEB. Last AFD was over 3 years ago; article hasn't improved since. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I love this site and was tempted to !vote keep but I can't find anything aside from what hammer found. It's a damn shame we can't keep this article. :( --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm right there with you, Ron - I'd love to be able to put a Keep here. But the sourcing just isn't there, and I try not to be a hypocrite before I get my coffee. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.