Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superheroes (Dani Harmer album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Free (Dani Harmer song). v/r - TP 20:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Superheroes (Dani Harmer album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Albums which were never actually released are only notable in exceptional circumstances, and there is no evidence this is such a case. Nothing worth merging to Dani Harmer that isn't already there, and title is a very unlikely search term. ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * May i ask what the notable in exceptional circumstances are? Thanks Sfxprefects (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * An unreleased album can be notable if it has received exceptional amounts of coverage in reliable third party sources, but this only happens in very rare cases -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge — Merge the information in Background into Dani Harmer; there's a little bit there that isn't in her main article. The rest of the article on the album is the tracklisting, which is entirely non-sourced and not likely notable.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 19:31, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge or how about merging the page with Free (Dani Harmer song) it could go on the bottom of the page titled unreleased becuase the album itself is related to the single becuase the album contains the single. Thanks Sfxprefects (talk) 20:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  01:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.