Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior Design Associates, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 03:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Superior Design Associates, Inc.

 * — (View AfD)

Likely spamvertising by single purpose account. The article mentions a couple of pages of coverage in local magazines, but I doubt they meet WP:CORP, especially considering their whopping 17 ghits. -- Islay Solomon  |  talk  00:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete on account of lack of notability and WP:CRYSTAL. It asserts notability, but it points to local information and trade journals, without providing web links - and I think many of the trade journals have web sites that can provide the information we need.  That, and the crystalballery comes from the further assertion that there is pending features on HGTV amongst others.  --Dennisthe2 01:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Fails WP:CORP. MER-C 02:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. J I P  | Talk 06:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an advert that fails WP:CORP.--Jersey Devil 08:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sci ence man 123  talk 21:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete on the basis of crystal balling and failing WP:CORP.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  00:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.