Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superlata


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Superlata

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Had this tagged as a speedy first but it didn't really fit the criteria. Apparently it's nothing more than an idea. Can't find any patent for this invention. If it is an invention.   SIS    23:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete; fails notability and verifiability.Synchronism (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete; ditto. NNMrathel (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, original was ineffective spam, currently virtual nonsense and fails most criteria. TrulyBlue (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The author has been blocked for spamming. TrulyBlue (talk) 14:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Not quite. The author was User:Figueiredodecarvalho, not User:Superlata. Puppet, maybe?    SIS    17:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was remembering the author of the original that was speedied. This re-creation is a cut-down version. TrulyBlue (talk) 09:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - as not notable, no reliable soruces writing about it, and spam. -- Whpq (talk) 17:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.