Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supermassive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete and redirect. --Core desat  03:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Supermassive

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

We already have Supermassive black holes which adequately explains this term. I cannot see it being used anywhere else &mdash;Moondyne 03:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, basically a dicdef; we also have supermassive, although a bit of this might be transwikied there. --Dhartung | Talk 04:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, and redirect. Philippe Beaudette 05:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; Not needed, per Dhartung. Also I call bunkum on the "supermassive void" oxymoron. :-P &mdash; RJH (talk) 18:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Doczilla 21:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect I don't care guys, that was like a test article for me. Do with it as you will, I leave it up to you. And the person above is right. It's not a dictionary. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anonymous Dissident (talk • contribs).
 * Delete. Per author Anonymous Dissident. Jerry lavoie 23:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.