Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supermposed fright


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob ert  00:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Supermposed fright
With 0 Google hits, this term is non-notable, neologistic, or both. –Sommers (Talk) 13:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Obviously not notable. Bobby1011 14:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. --Ter e nce Ong 14:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. Kuru   talk  17:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:VAIN. The article says very little about what "superimposed fright" really is (the article title is also misspelled, BTW), the term doesn't seem to exist anyhow, and the only thing the article really does is link to an article on a brand name pharmaceutical.  So it appears to be badly done advertising. MSJapan 21:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and MSJapan.  dbtfz talk 02:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without hesitation. -- Krash (Talk) 15:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.