Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superpanopticon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Leivick (talk) 23:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Superpanopticon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't look notable, no sourcing. D.M.N. (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom.-- S R X  14:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Certainly notable, but seems to fall foul of WP:NEO. If this undoubted neologism for a very real concept has achieved any sort of currency, then the article needs to demonstrate that clearly before we can regard it as acceptably encyclopedic.


 * Besides which, have we no standards for quality? The very least this article needs to do is to cite its etymology from Panopticon. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.