Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superphone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 21:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Superphone

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable. wp:note Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 20:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism not describing a currently identifiable concept. Entry probably spurred by recent articles like this one, can be transwikied if anyone cares enough.  Wikipedia is not a dictionary.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 20:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect to Smartphone. Its just a marketing term and even the Marketing Droid at Google couldn't come up with a valid reason to differentate it from a Smartphone besides "It has a 1 Ghz processor!" -- KelleyCook (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism. Barring that, redirect as above. Hairhorn (talk) 21:36, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, just a marketing term, no need for an article. Although if there's a redirect involved, it should be to the Nexus One, since it's a Google term, and the Nexus One is the only applicable phone. C628 (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * keep, Name of a new genertion of phones--123.237.195.103 (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Above comment is User:123.237.195.103 first contribution to Wikipedia.
 * Delete or redir to Smartphone. Just because a marketing droid creates a buzzword, it doesn't mean we should all grek to his froobyness. Syrthiss (talk) 12:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons already listed above. Klparrot (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep! Eventually, Google will release more phones and it will be notable.  There is a difference between a superphone and a smartphone.  Someone looking for an article on a superphone who gets to a smartphone will find out what a smartphone is but never find out what a superphone is whether it is a marketing work or not.--iBendiscuss 02:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What is the difference? Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 06:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * So by your own admission, the neologism "superphone" is not currently notable. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Neologism produced solely to market a product. Did I miss something, has Wikipedia suddenly become a billboard? AlistairMcMillan (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.