Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superpoly Fabric (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SpinningSpark 22:48, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Superpoly Fabric
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'd originally speedied this as WP:G11, as much of the article's content was pretty promotional in tone. It was originally nominated as something that had been previously deleted via AfD, but this was speedied before it could run through a fully AfD. (Hence the reason why User:NatGertler declined the original speedy.) After thinking on it a little, I decided that it'd be better to run this through a full, formal AfD to decide if superpoly fabric is ultimately notable enough for its own article. I have to admit that I'm not seeing that much out there that specifically focuses on this particular term. At the prior AfD User:Steve Lux, Jr. argued that this did not expand substantially on Polyester and I'm inclined to agree with him. From what I can see, this appears to be a new term for polyester and doesn't really bring anything substantial to the table. However I figure that it'd be worth bringing this through AfD just in case, that way we can have an official consensus to pull from in the future. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Attempt at product placement/promotion in the Indian market. Same article was also created as Superpoly which was speedy-deleted G11 on 5 August. No obvious independent information available - might merit a line, or two at the most, at Polyester. - Arjayay (talk) 07:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Just a quick note to make clear (as I think Tokyogirl is already clear on) that my declining the speedy should not be taken in any way as a "keep" vote; it was strictly a procedural objection to the specific speedy criteria that was being cited. It was not an objection even to the general concept of speedying the article; I have not yet made any evaluation on appropriateness of the article or the topic (and may not). --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence of being a notabile product or meting WP:GNG. Delete or redirect to Polyester. Boleyn (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.