Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superwoman Complex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  22:25, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Superwoman Complex

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

I nominate this article for deletion on the grounds it is extremely biased and the whole concept relies solely on one article written by a barely notable journalist. Freikorp (talk) 10:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Neutral for the time being. News archives show a fairly large number of hits for the phrase, including widely reported uses by Dr Joyce Brothers and Fran Drescher; but it isn't clear that they're talking about the same thing as this article, or that the meaning is any more than trivial or tautological.  I am not sure that the sources found could be used to create a coherent explanation of a single phenomenon here, but I'm open to the possibility. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete silly, neologistic phrase for journos to hang pieces on. No currency in sociology/psychology/popular discourse that I can see. Declan Clam (talk) 23:52, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-Notable and silly fringe theory attacking feminism from a soapbox. Bearian (talk) 18:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.