Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supreme Understanding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Supreme Understanding

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

NN author. Self-published references only. Sabih omar 20:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and New Jersey. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 03:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: As not notable. Any perceived notability is created by self promotion. The subject's name appears to be Sujan Dass. Pseudonyms such as "Supreme Understanding", are not uncommon but adding things such as "Dr. Supreme Understanding" become an indirect conflict of interest when an article is created using primary sources and potential reliable sources, such as "FinalCall.com News", and even a source that might shed light on claims the subject was awarded a Japan-Fulbright Memorial Fund Scholarship, and was named "Teacher of the Year" are dead links. The subject's "Writing style" is questioned in the article, although as unsupported original research, with "This style is curious, given his claims about his own higher education". A claim of being a doctor should be sourced. The subject is the owner of Supreme Design Publishing] thus allowing the promotion of the books and name.


 * Delete. I don't see how this person passes WP:GNG in any way. There is not a single reliable source independent of the subject. Even if it is not autobiography, there is zero evidence this passes GNG. Bearian (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.