Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supriya Chakrabarti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:54, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Supriya Chakrabarti

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In a source search and given the sources of the article, I didn't find enough to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Being a principal investigator isn't sufficient to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC, particularly for a non-major project. Sam-2727 (talk) 03:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 03:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  05:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. -Hatchens (talk) 16:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Please let me know in what parts I can improve the article. The article supports WP:NACADEMIC in criteria 6. As in criteria 6, S. Chakrabarti is appointed as the director of a major academic institution. Also in criteria 4, his academic work has made a significant impact in the area of undergraduate studies with association with notable institutes. Also as of criteria 2, he has got the prestigious G.W.G award. Yes its true that it does not meet the criterias well. But that does not mean that he is not notable. Please provide me what edit I should or can do to improve the article. -AnkurWiki, 2:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm actually personally unsure if being the director of the "Lowell Center for Space Science and Technology" meets NPROF 6. Also, although the "GWG" (located here) award might be an impressive award, I don't know if it rises to the standard of "highly prestigious on a national or international level." Regardless, this is certainly on edge case, in my opinion. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I think that citation 6 meets properly as the director is the top post (or at least one of the ) of a reputed academic institution. Citation 2 partially meets. His work is notable on the Picture C projects (see here ) and on finding habitable planets. Yes its true that the article can be improved in some parts and sections. But nothing is found to prove him not notable, in my opinion. - AnkurWiki, 09:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 21:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. I was initially on the fence because of the "known for" blue links in the infobox, but now I see they just link to sections of his biography rather than standalone pages. The blue link for LoCSST also just leads to the UMass wiki page, not even a subsection dedicated to it there. This doesn't demonstrate notability. JoelleJay (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Due to lack of sufficient independant significant coverage to date. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Alack of persistent coverage in third-party, independent reliable sources is too commonly a problem for our academician-articles. ——  Serial  18:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.