Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surajit Chandra Das


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by. (non-admin closure) --JBL (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Surajit Chandra Das

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Makes several claims to notability but searches in Google Books, ProQuest and other places do not give us anything that can support the claims. I'm not sure if winning the Anundoram Barooa Award is worthy of WP:ANYBIO or not but the claim is currently unsourced so I suppose that is a moot point. His work in mathematics would appear to allow for a passing of WP:NACADEMIC but I can't find anything to support the claims of inventing new formulae. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Philosophy, Poetry, Mathematics,  and India.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Personally I would have tagged this uncited autobiography with CSD A7 (the criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible) or G11. --JBL (talk) 14:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of mathematical work of any kind, let alone passing WP:PROF for it. Google Scholar has two profiles for people named Surajit Das, a marine immunologist and a lipid drug delivery engineer ; neither appear to be the subject. MathSciNet lists nobody by that name. The other claims of the article appear equally overblown and unsourceable. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Indeed, looks like a A7/G11 (to sound like someone who's been on Wikipedia too long). XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete g11 and g3 hoax. This is obviously made up puffy garbage. If there were a real credible claim here, it'd be a different story and there's not and a search shows this is all, well, bullshit. CUPIDICAE💕  16:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.