Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surajpura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep WP:SNOW and WP:OUTCOMES. Villages are inherently notable. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Surajpura

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Shows no context or notability, unsalvageably badly written, if anything should be merged into the article dealing with that region. [ roux  ] [ x ] 05:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, as per the standard for such locations. Yes, it needs work, but that's not a reason for deletion. -- Kickstart70 T C 06:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * My word... hello fellow MeFite! I dunno.. I don't believe that all geolocs are inherently notable. Kill it and let it be recreated. [ roux  ] [ x ] 06:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't spam, that website isn't notable anyway, and if that's a point you're trying to make, no one understands it and you're wasting our time. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 07:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Beg your pardon? I'm not spamming, the website is notable, and I'm not trying to make a point. I was just greeting someone I happen to know from elsewhere. [ roux  ] [ x ] 07:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - another article about India that's below substandard in quality, but the Rohtas district has a population of 2.4m, and the first of the "great people" listed in the article is apparently a great literary figure from Surajpura. Somno (talk) 06:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup and expand, per all towns, cities, villages etc. --Gene_poole (talk) 07:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Small but acceptable geostub with scope for expansion.--Michig (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep far from being unsalvagable, it's already been tidied up. And real geographical places are inherently notable. Edward321 (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.