Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SureThing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 22:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

SureThing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lack of Notability and for advertisment Parvazbato59 (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete as essentially promotional rather than encyclopaedic in nature. NB: I've added the NOINDEX magic word and nowiki'ed the links in the article, these edits should not be reverted unless the outcome of this debate is keep.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  08:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand, perhaps adding more information on parent company. Several 'house brand' labeler programs from CD/DVD manufacturers, such as Verbatum, are using a modified version of this program.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.76.235.253 (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

*Strong delete A CD labeler? C'mon. 'Nuff said.Bildstit (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Striking out !vote of a sockpuppet of a banned editor. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Proof proof and more proof. We can't rely on hunches and personal knowledge. - Mgm|(talk) 11:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —94.196.163.252 (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —94.196.163.252 (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  —94.196.163.252 (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - article lacks 3rd party references establishing notability. Dialectric (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete — Come on. No decent refs, no notability, obvious advertising. roux    16:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes the notability guidelines. Here is a review from Information World Review, an article from CD Computing News, and another article from VNU Business Publications. These reliable, third-party sources give in-depth reviews of the subject of this article and are enough to establish this CD labeler's notability. Cunard (talk) 22:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.