Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surendra Panwar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD G5 Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Surendra Panwar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

One of a number of sub-standard items frm the same editor (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajaram Meel). Does not pass WP:GNG, sourcing is only to articles written by the subject. Eagleash (talk) 07:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete (or Speedy delete) I just moved this to drafts half an hour ago, now this AfD opens, and turns out in between this was already draftified a second time. No indication of notability by any stretch of definition. Before draftifying I was first going to request A7/G11 on this, and still think it's eligible for that, but equally happy to let the AfD run its course. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and India.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - journalist just doing their job with no apparent significant coverage about them. Panwar has written a few articles but articles written by the subject do not confer notability. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article has been moved unilaterally to Draft, presumably to circumvent this process 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment This page has been moved to a different title and around in Draft space and in returning it to its original location, several edits were deleted. They had no affect on the content of this article though. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Journalist fails WP:NBIO with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing to show how he is notable, no reliable secondary sources. The article creator may be a sockpuppet, see Sockpuppet investigations/Baba1031. --bonadea contributions talk 20:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Admin note Deleted per WP:CSD.-- Ponyo bons mots 20:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.