Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surface Detail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) NW ( Talk ) 23:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Surface Detail

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. Contested PROD but non-notable per WP:BK. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Obvious keep. This is the latest in a notable series of books on The Culture by a notable author. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Obvious keep per scj. --John (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Obvious keep, indeed. htom (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Obvious keep, for all the stated reasons. TJIC (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  --  Marcus   Qwertyus   23:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep has multiple RS so far, but if not kept, Merge to The Culture as part of a clearly notable series. Jclemens (talk) 19:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep because nomination states no clear basis for deletion, its like the current U.S. foreclosure snafu -- you can't foreclose (delete) unless you can explain why it should be done.--Milowent • talkblp-r 20:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep - It's a notable book in an ongoing series by an award-winning author. What's the (supposed) thinking behind this proposal? I am baffled. Derekbd (talk) 20:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep Luzr (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep Green0eggs (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Ridiculously obvious keep and a nomination suggesting unfortunately poor judgement on the part of the nominator (in the best good faith, of course) - David Gerard (talk) 22:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The other eight books in the series have pages. Sure, this one is short, but it'll expand in time to match the rest of them. 128.205.230.236 (talk) 06:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Obvious Keep Latest book by internationally famous author in acclaimed series. Well referenced even before prod added. Unsure why this was nominated at all. --Raerth (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.