Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surface Network Modelling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Already speedied by snowspinner. – Rich Farmbrough 20:34, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Surface Network Modelling
Maybe it's a notable topic... One would never know from this article, whose only content is to plug one researcher, and a link -- which is broken. Alai 05:17, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't really pass the Google test - it seems to be a term peculiar to this one researcher and his group at UCL, and there doesn't seem to be anything to say about it that wouldn't be a copyvio. Keithlard 05:30, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if re-written. I've fixed the link.  It's a reputable academic area about which quite a bit could be said.  I get close to 600 Googles for    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   12:26, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not worth to keep even as a stub. Somebody who's keen on this topic will write a new article about it eventually. -- Rune Welsh &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; 20:52, 2 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.