Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surfism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 02:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Surfism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I see no evidence that the philosophy of "Surfism" actually exists as such. I do not believe that the topic is sufficiently important for a page, inasmuch as it's received no attention whatsoever in the academic world. The Rhymesmith (talk) 22:33, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism. Can't find anything not self-created about the philosophy. Some legitimate references are misspellings of sufism --Torchwood Who? (talk) 23:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable neologism. Dan Weber is the only person in the universe to use the term. --Odie5533 (talk) 23:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I suppose "put down the pipe, brah" isn't a legit reason in these debates, so let's just call it a blatant non-notable neologism. Carrite (talk) 06:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  10:48, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research: The surfing metaphor represents the structural coherence of perception derived from the triadic relations inherent in spatial perception. The interplay between temporal relations, which are monadic, and spatial relations, which are dyadic, determines the individual's ability to engage spatio-temporal relations, which are triadic.  Yeah, don't bogart that.... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not actually sure whether or not it's technically OR, given the "sources". Not that that matters, as far as I'm concerned. The Rhymesmith (talk) 00:37, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.