Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surgical Lasers Incorporated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Surgical Lasers Incorporated

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. The few sources independent of the subject are routine announcements and a press release. A WP:BEFORE search didn't reveal a significant coverage in reliable sources. Rentier (talk) 14:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete : Provided references are either press release or pdf, which does not pass WP:GNG BetterSmile:D 14:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, is not covered in depth and fails to meet WP:CORPDEPTH criteria.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Typical corporate wiki-spam.   -- RoySmith (talk) 01:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.