Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surjan charit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 07:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Surjan charit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I had this as a deletion-but upon searching for any info-all I could find was a link to a list of books, nothing for the author either. All I can figure out that its a non fictional book with mythology. Wgolf (talk) 00:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete neither the book nor the author seem to have anything written about them. There is no claim of notability in the article (stub). It's a pity that the original author of the article has not edited since April, as it would be nice to know the full name of the author and around when the original was published. The book does not seem to be held in many libraries. This bibliographic record shows the author as: Chandra Shekhar and the title as: Surjan Charit mahakavyam with commentary and translation into English by Chander Dhar Sarma Sastriyana. There was a Chandra Shekhar, 1927-2007, who wrote about politics and social change, but it does not look like the same Chandra Shekhar. The title seems to also appear as Surjan Charit Mahakavya and it is mentioned as a non-Persian source for medieval Indian history. --Bejnar (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, I wasn't able to find anything but the usual routine listings for this book. "Weak" because there may be sources in Indian languages that I can't read, but otherwise I largely agree with User:Bejnar above.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.