Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survey & Ballot Systems (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Survey & Ballot Systems
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Written entirely by a user seemingly employed by the subject of the article, cites 0 sources and I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV, so fails WP:GNG. ULPS (talk) 23:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. No indication of meeting WP:NORG. Jmertel23 (talk)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Minnesota. AllyD (talk) 06:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Note there is also a Draft:Survey & Ballot Systems, containing the same unreferenced promotional text. AllyD (talk) 06:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uncited; no attempt to comply with WP policies on sourcing. Kablammo (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: A COI article whose draft should have been left to await AfC review. Leaving aside the promotional nature of the present text and its lack of references, the AfD on the previous instance was 14 years ago so this merits a fresh look. The previous AfD discussion indicates that some sources had been found at that time, however, now even more than then, the requirements regarding pages on companies are strict, and searches are not finding evidence that this firm has attained notability here. AllyD (talk) 12:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Even if the article was significantly re-written to comply with WP:NPOV, I am still not convinced that it would meet the WP:ORG notability guidelines for a company. JoshuaGrayy (talk) 17:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I searched the online archives of the Star Tribune to see if there was any coverage, and I found only one or two articles that mentioned the company to any significant extent.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG  --  Devoke  water  14:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete GNG aside, this type of conflict-of-interest article creation is required to use AFC. The article clearly does not meet their standards, and there is a separate copy of the article which is already a draft. Walt Yoder (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.