Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surveys of academic opinion regarding parapsychology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If anyone is interesting in merging content, let me know and I can provide it. Tone 21:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Surveys of academic opinion regarding parapsychology

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. Prod reason was: "WP:NOT#Systematic review - this is just a collection of studies, already reported at Parapsychology." Anything not in the parent article that is relevant should be added, but most of this material should just be dropped. Verbal chat  10:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * merge, this is what is supposed to be the scope of the main parapsychology article. --dab (𒁳) 14:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV article by POV warrior which picks and chooses surveys to back up their own minority opinion. Wikipedia is not your webhost. Black Kite 14:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as prodder. I did not see anything that I thought needed to be in Parapsychology, but a merge would be fine if there is. - 2/0 (cont.) 14:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.