Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. –MuZemike 01:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Survivor Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Record label, who may have some notable clients, is not it's self notable. (see WP:Inherited) - Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG as it has not had significant coverage of it's own. Codf1977 (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep significance is not a question. Wandering Courier (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: The artists are notable, but the record label isn't. Joe Chill (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, until notability is established using multiple 3rd party sources. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 00:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Lengthy and significant roster of artists; important in its genre as such. Meets WP:MUSIC's definition of "one of the more important indie labels". Chubbles (talk) 07:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Keep - as per above. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 03:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually, after looking at another separate AfD that I was commenting in, I am changing to keep. Now that I look closer, I see that the label does in fact have notable artists associated with it. And I do not believe WP:INHERITED is even remotely appropriate here, because, as I said in the other AfD, being signed on a record label is much different than the type of "association" that is mentioned in WP:INHERITED. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 23:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think WP:INHERITED is exactly right here - I am not saying that having notable artists associated with it does not bring the company notability, it might, but that has to be demonstrated by significant coverage of it's own just having notable artists associated and saying that it is notable as a result is a case of WP:INHERITED. With out the significant coverage of it's own this company fails WP:CORP.Codf1977 (talk) 06:55, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Some above argued against deletion... Chubbles (talk) 22:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notable company - Seems to be part of a mass nomination of record labels which the nominator seems to have something against.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.