Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivors' Insurance (Industry, etc.) Convention, 1933 (shelved)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Survivors' Insurance (Industry, etc.) Convention, 1933 (shelved)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

De-prodded after expiry because apparently it was prodded before, but I did not see a previous prod at the time. No sourcing found. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing to show why it's a notable treaty, although it looks like it was never implemented, so why have an article? Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * delete No claim to notability, and the ratifications show hardly anyone cared. Needs some degree of third party analysis at least. Mangoe (talk) 02:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to List of International Labour Organization Conventions. ILO seems to have been set up by the League of Nations and to have produced a series of International Conventions, of which his is one.  The infobox provides links to two more, which have equally little information.  All should be similarly merged or redirected, where there is no substantive article.  My target is a list article covering all of these.  I take it that shelved conventions are ones that have been superseded by something more recent.  They will have been important in their time and hence notable.  Notability is not temporary.  I am saying merge, because it looks as if there is a link to a website which gives the convention's text.  This link needs to be added to the list, along with the statement that it is shelved.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Invalidity, Old-Age and Survivors' Benefits Convention, 1967, but without the "shelved" part, and similarly all the other "shelved" conventions listed there that were apparently later integrated into the 1967 convention. Possibly merge if anything can be sourced.  Sandstein   22:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: While there's a consensus to redirect the article, I'm giving this discussion another round since there are two redirect targets indicated above. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🎉  (HAPPY 2022) 05:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. As far as I can tell, nobody who has ever edited this article included an explanation of what this convention declared or what it means for it to have been shelved. The text includes a quotation, "Having decided upon the adoption of certain proposals with regard to compulsory widows' and orphans' insurance,..." which is an incomplete sentence and doesn't give any indication of which proposals were adopted. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: No evidence of notability. Furthermore, there is not only no consensus to redirect, a redirect wouldn't be appropriate even if there was, per WP:XY: there's no obvious redirect target that precludes the other.   Ravenswing      11:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.