Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Arann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Susan Arann

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No notability, she is a presedent of a company that doesn't have a wiki itself. Possible sockpuppitry between User:Susan Huckvale Arann and User:Lucykamp. Battleaxe9872 Talk 20:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * delete, seems like vanity page. More importantly, no sources listed. Pamela  BMX  21:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Per WP:Afd: The accusation VANITY should be avoided, and is not in itself a reason for deletion.  Ty  17:21, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

I've already added some sources and I'm also working on the page of the company. Sorry but I need time to edit it. Lucykamp —Preceding undated comment added 21:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete No matter how many sources you add, it would fail to meet notability requirements. Tom Reedy (talk) 22:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete 'Vanity, vanity, all is vanity' or something like that... There is an article (equally brief) about the company - but it's tagged for SD. Peridon (talk) 22:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Per WP:Afd: The accusation VANITY should be avoided, and is not in itself a reason for deletion.  Ty  17:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. The article may not be vanity. Someone totally unreleted might have decided to write it (and the one about the company) out of the goodness of their heart. It's still not notable and deletable on that ground, in my opinion. Peridon (talk) 08:50, 31 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Also at: Susan Arann (disambiguation) and User:Susan Huckvale Arann edited by Susan Huckvale Arann and LucyKamp. Can these be added to the nomination? I've tagged the 'disambig' page for SD. Peridon (talk) 22:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, COI. Hairhorn (talk)
 * Speedy delete No evidence of significance or notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete because I can't find anything online that she's done of any importance. There are literally zero news Ghits except for her activity on the Women's Committee for the NSO. There are some Ghits, but they don't paint much of a picture.  She's a designer who has given some money to St. John's University  and other charities.  How is that notable? Bearian (talk) 19:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.